Published: July 21, 2010
Author(s)
Stefan Popoveniuc, Andrew Regenscheid
Conference
Name: 4th International Conference on Electronic Voting (EVOTE2010)
Dates: July 21-24, 2010
Location: Bregenz, Austria
Citation: Electronic Voting 2010 (EVOTE2010), Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI) - Proceedings pp. 179-190
Announcement
We present Sigma ballots, a new type of ballot to be used in secure elections. Sigma ballots use the random order of candidates introduced by Pret a Voter, combined with the confirmation codes of Scantegrity II. These ballots can be produces by a DRE machine with a slightly modified VVPAT, or can be similar to optical scan ballots. Sigma ballots work in conjunction with existing publicly verifiable tallying schemes to allow for end-to-end verifiability. The advantages of Sigma ballots include an easy check for correct printing, the possibility of keeping a fixed order of candidates when selections are made, automated creation of receipts, no extra marks added to the ballot after it was cast, ability to be hand counted, and voters only needing to know a valid confirmation code to file a complaint.
We present Sigma ballots, a new type of ballot to be used in secure elections. Sigma ballots use the random order of candidates introduced by Pret a Voter, combined with the confirmation codes of Scantegrity II. These ballots can be produces by a DRE machine with a slightly modified VVPAT, or can be...
See full abstract
We present Sigma ballots, a new type of ballot to be used in secure elections. Sigma ballots use the random order of candidates introduced by Pret a Voter, combined with the confirmation codes of Scantegrity II. These ballots can be produces by a DRE machine with a slightly modified VVPAT, or can be similar to optical scan ballots. Sigma ballots work in conjunction with existing publicly verifiable tallying schemes to allow for end-to-end verifiability. The advantages of Sigma ballots include an easy check for correct printing, the possibility of keeping a fixed order of candidates when selections are made, automated creation of receipts, no extra marks added to the ballot after it was cast, ability to be hand counted, and voters only needing to know a valid confirmation code to file a complaint.
Hide full abstract
Keywords
cryptographic voting system; E2E; end-to-end verifiability; voting; voting system
Control Families
None selected