Published: September 05, 2011
Author(s)
Celeste Paul (University of Maryland Baltimore County), Emile Morse (NIST), Aiping Zhang (NIST), Yee-Yin Choong (NIST), Mary Theofanos (NIST)
Conference
Name: 13th IFIP TC13 Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT 2011)
Dates: September 5-9, 2011
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Citation: Human-Computer Interaction -- INTERACT 2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 6949, pp. 1-17
A field study of 24 participants over 10 weeks explored user behavior and perceptions in a smartcard authentication system. Ethnographic methods used to collect data included diaries, surveys, interviews, and field observations. We observed a number of issues users experienced while they integrated smartcards into their work processes, including forgetting smartcards in readers, forgetting to use smartcards to authenticate, and difficulty understanding digital signatures and encryption. The greatest perceived benefit was the use of an easy-to-remember PIN in replacement of complicated passwords. The greatest perceived drawback was the lack of smartcard-supported applications. Overall, most participants had a positive experience using smartcards for authentication. Perceptions were influenced by personal benefits experienced by participants rather than an increase in security.
A field study of 24 participants over 10 weeks explored user behavior and perceptions in a smartcard authentication system. Ethnographic methods used to collect data included diaries, surveys, interviews, and field observations. We observed a number of issues users experienced while they integrated...
See full abstract
A field study of 24 participants over 10 weeks explored user behavior and perceptions in a smartcard authentication system. Ethnographic methods used to collect data included diaries, surveys, interviews, and field observations. We observed a number of issues users experienced while they integrated smartcards into their work processes, including forgetting smartcards in readers, forgetting to use smartcards to authenticate, and difficulty understanding digital signatures and encryption. The greatest perceived benefit was the use of an easy-to-remember PIN in replacement of complicated passwords. The greatest perceived drawback was the lack of smartcard-supported applications. Overall, most participants had a positive experience using smartcards for authentication. Perceptions were influenced by personal benefits experienced by participants rather than an increase in security.
Hide full abstract
Keywords
human factors; multi-factor authentication; security; smartcard
Control Families
None selected