Date Published: October 2010
Planning Note (04/28/2023):
NIST is planning to convert this publication by merging it into a revised SP 800-38A. See the announcement for full details.
Author(s)
Morris Dworkin (NIST)
A limitation to Cipher Block Chaining (CBC) mode, as specified in NIST Special Publication 800-38A, is that the plaintext input must consist of a sequence of blocks. Ciphertext stealing is a padding method in which the required padding bits are "stolen" from the penultimate ciphertext block. This addendum to SP 800-38A specifies three variants of CBC mode with ciphertext stealing. These variants, which differ only in the ordering of the ciphertext bits, can encrypt any input whose bit length is greater than or equal to the block size. Unlike conventional padding methods, these variants do not expand the length of the data.
A limitation to Cipher Block Chaining (CBC) mode, as specified in NIST Special Publication 800-38A, is that the plaintext input must consist of a sequence of blocks. Ciphertext stealing is a padding method in which the required padding bits are "stolen" from the penultimate ciphertext block. This...
See full abstract
A limitation to Cipher Block Chaining (CBC) mode, as specified in NIST Special Publication 800-38A, is that the plaintext input must consist of a sequence of blocks. Ciphertext stealing is a padding method in which the required padding bits are "stolen" from the penultimate ciphertext block. This addendum to SP 800-38A specifies three variants of CBC mode with ciphertext stealing. These variants, which differ only in the ordering of the ciphertext bits, can encrypt any input whose bit length is greater than or equal to the block size. Unlike conventional padding methods, these variants do not expand the length of the data.
Hide full abstract
Keywords
block cipher; ciphertext stealing; cryptography; encryption; mode of operation
Control Families
System and Communications Protection
) or https:// don't prove our archive is authentic, only that you securely accessed it. Note that we are working to fix that :)
